#COPERNIC DESKTOP SEARCH IDLE FULL#

The search in vista and 7 should be faster and more efficient than copernic even. There are other reasons, but here's my main reason for sticking to WS: For example, saved searches and search as you type. To even get some of the features WS has you have to purchase the higher editions. So, You shouldn't notice any slowdown while it's indexingįor kicks, I tried out the home edition of Copernic desktop search, and while it's better than the search XP provides by default in that it's instant and also looks within the files (which WS also does), it doesn't compare to WS.

#COPERNIC DESKTOP SEARCH IDLE FULL#

It will only index at full speed during idle periods.

Indexing speed of Windows Search (WS) is reduced when there's user activity. That was always Copernic, and I would have to exit it to let the deletion take place, again.is deleting files in Win7 ever a problem? The only problem I ever had with Copernic was occasionally when trying to delete files that had only recently been created so Copernic was adding them to its index, and XP wouldn't let me delete as 'something' was using the file. So, what I want to know is.is W7 Search as good as Copernic? Main reason? I used Copernic desktop search for years in XP, brilliant program that after it's initial indexing, really doesn't slow the system at all in the slightest as further re-indexing is suspended instantly when moving a mouse, pressing a key, system busy etc and doesn't try again for a user set time period. I've only recently started using Win7.64 and disabled Indexing for now.

Copernic desktop search idle